COE vs COST
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
COE presents a high-risk profile characterized by a stable but mediocre Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a complete absence of a Graham Number due to negative earnings. While the company exhibits explosive revenue growth of 88.60% and strong gross margins (73.91%), these are overshadowed by severe financial instability, including negative equity (P/B of -4.90) and a critical liquidity shortage (Current Ratio 0.63). The combination of a 0/100 technical trend and collapsing YoY EPS growth (-149.1%) suggests a speculative asset in financial distress despite top-line expansion.
COST shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
COE vs COST: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.