COST vs DEO
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
COST shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating operational stability, DEO is exhibiting severe fundamental decay and technical weakness. The stock is trading at a significant premium to both its Graham Number ($10.62) and Intrinsic Value ($49.15), while facing a catastrophic collapse in earnings growth (-62.3% YoY EPS). A dividend payout ratio of 95.64% is unsustainable given the negative revenue growth and crashing quarterly EPS, suggesting a high risk of a dividend cut. The technical trend is completely bearish (0/100), and long-term price performance is dismal (-49.1% over 5 years).
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
COST vs DEO: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Diageo plc (DEO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.