COST vs FC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
COST shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Franklin Covey exhibits severe financial fragility, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating weak operational health. While the company maintains a very low debt-to-equity ratio (0.02), it suffers from a significant liquidity crisis with a current ratio of 0.63 and a quick ratio of 0.42. Stagnant revenue growth (0.10% YoY) and a disastrous recent earnings track record—missing 4 of the last 4 estimates with an average surprise of -82.73%—suggest a failing business model or a difficult transition. Despite a low Price-to-Sales ratio, the combination of negative profit margins and a bearish technical trend (10/100) outweighs the analyst target price.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
COST vs FC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Franklin Covey Co. (FC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.