CTOS vs CXW
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
CTOS exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health. While the stock has seen a massive 1-year price surge (+105.2%), this momentum is disconnected from the underlying financials, which show negative profit margins (-1.60%) and declining earnings growth (-26.50%). High leverage (Debt/Equity of 2.99) combined with a dangerously low Quick Ratio (0.24) suggests significant liquidity risk. The valuation is stretched with a Forward P/E of 41.62 despite stagnant revenue growth.
CXW presents a stable financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a valuation that sits comfortably between its Graham Number ($18.47) and Intrinsic Value ($31.86). The company is exhibiting aggressive growth, with YoY earnings growth of 42.4% and a highly attractive forward P/E of 9.93. While technical trends and insider sentiment are currently bearish, the strong earnings beat track record and analyst consensus suggest significant upside potential. The overall profile is that of a growth-oriented value play within a specialized industrial niche.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
CTOS vs CXW: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) and CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.