CTOS vs GRC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
CTOS exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health. While the stock has seen a massive 1-year price surge (+105.2%), this momentum is disconnected from the underlying financials, which show negative profit margins (-1.60%) and declining earnings growth (-26.50%). High leverage (Debt/Equity of 2.99) combined with a dangerously low Quick Ratio (0.24) suggests significant liquidity risk. The valuation is stretched with a Forward P/E of 41.62 despite stagnant revenue growth.
GRC exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and excellent liquidity (Current Ratio 2.93), though an Altman Z-Score was not provided. While earnings growth is explosive at 46.6% YoY, the stock is trading at a significant premium to its Graham Number ($28.54) and above its growth-based intrinsic value ($66.08). The massive 1-year price surge of 117% has pushed the valuation to a point where the PEG ratio (2.55) suggests the stock is overextended. Consequently, while the business is high-quality, the current entry point is risky.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
CTOS vs GRC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.