CW vs HEI-A
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Curtiss-Wright exhibits exceptional operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a flawless 25-quarter earnings beat record. However, the company is severely overvalued, trading at $717.53—nearly double its growth-based intrinsic value of $378.78 and far exceeding its Graham Number of $140.92. While the fundamental quality is top-tier, the combination of a high P/E (55.88), bearish insider selling by the CEO and CFO, and a weak technical trend (10/100) suggests significant downside risk or a period of stagnation.
HEI-A exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a robust current ratio of 3.06, indicating a high-quality balance sheet. However, the stock is significantly overvalued relative to its Graham Number ($60.64) and growth-based intrinsic value ($130.29), trading at a steep premium with a P/E of 40.62. While long-term growth in the Aerospace & Defense sector remains a tailwind, the current technical trend is bearish (0/100) and the forward P/E is expanding, suggesting a potential valuation correction.
Compare Another Pair
CW vs HEI-A: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and HEICO Corporation (HEI-A) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.