CWT vs NWN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
CWT exhibits a stable but mediocre Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating a lack of strong financial momentum. While the company maintains better-than-sector profit margins and lower debt-to-equity than its peers, it is plagued by severe earnings contraction (-42.20% YoY) and stagnant revenue growth. The stock is currently trading at a significant premium to both its Graham Number ($37.02) and its growth-based intrinsic value ($15.05), while technicals and insider sentiment are overwhelmingly bearish.
NWN presents a dichotomy between strong fundamental earnings performance and deteriorating technical/insider sentiment. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates a stable financial health baseline, and the stock trades significantly below its growth-based intrinsic value of $81.72, though it sits above its defensive Graham Number of $47.03. While earnings growth is robust (24.10% YoY) and the company consistently beats estimates, severe liquidity constraints (Current Ratio 0.72) and bearish insider selling offset the bullish valuation metrics.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
CWT vs NWN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares California Water Service Group (CWT) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.