DUK vs ED
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
DUK shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Consolidated Edison (ED) presents as a stable but stagnating utility with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating a stable but non-improving financial health profile. While the company maintains superior profit margins and lower debt-to-equity ratios compared to the utility sector average, it is currently struggling with negative earnings growth (-8.3% YoY) and a bearish technical trend. The stock trades at a premium to its Graham Number ($92.20) and significantly above its growth-based intrinsic value, suggesting limited upside potential. Overall, ED is a defensive hold with reliable dividends but lacks the growth catalysts required for a bullish rating.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
DUK vs ED: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.