EMR vs NSC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Emerson Electric (EMR) trades at a premium valuation with a current P/E of 31.66, above both its forward P/E of 20.19 and the sector average of 27.54, suggesting some near-term multiple compression risk. Despite solid long-term profitability—evidenced by a 20.72% operating margin and consistent earnings beat streak (22 of last 25 quarters)—recent YoY earnings contraction of -35.3% raises near-term concerns. The stock has underperformed peers over the past year (+1.0% vs. sector momentum), though it shows resilience in dividend policy and maintains a manageable 0.68 debt/equity ratio. Analysts remain constructive with a $151.00 target price implying ~18% upside, but weak insider activity and liquidity metrics temper bullish conviction.
NSC exhibits a stable but mediocre financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9. The stock is severely overvalued, trading at $321.44 despite a Graham Number of $140.92 and an Intrinsic Value of $89.18. This valuation gap is exacerbated by negative year-over-year revenue (-1.70%) and earnings growth (-11.40%), resulting in an unsustainable PEG ratio of 4.12. While operational margins remain strong, the fundamental data suggests the current price is driven by momentum rather than value.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
EMR vs NSC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.