FMS vs JNJ
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
FMS presents a classic deep-value opportunity, characterized by a stable Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a current price ($22.77) trading significantly below both its Graham Number ($35.27) and Intrinsic Value ($58.12). While top-line revenue growth is stagnant (-0.30%), the company has demonstrated a massive recovery in earnings and maintains a sustainable dividend payout ratio of 42.76%. The valuation is exceptionally attractive with a Forward P/E of 5.62 and a Price/Book of 0.81. However, the bullish value thesis is countered by a completely bearish technical trend and weak insider sentiment, suggesting a 'value trap' risk if revenue does not stabilize.
JNJ presents a dichotomy between strong profitability and deteriorating fundamental health, evidenced by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9. While the company maintains an impressive ROE of 35.03% and a consistent history of earnings beats, the current price of $237.96 trades at a significant premium to its Graham Number of $91.72. Growth remains robust on a YoY basis, but bearish insider sentiment and a very weak technical trend (10/100) suggest immediate headwinds. The stock is fundamentally sound in terms of earnings power but shows signs of operational inefficiency or declining quality in its deterministic health metrics.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
FMS vs JNJ: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.