No connection

Search Results

GOOS vs LIND

GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$11.71
Market Cap
$1.14B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%
LIND
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$19.13
Market Cap
$1.25B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
GOOS
73.19
LIND
--
Forward P/E
GOOS
15.95
LIND
68.31
P/B Ratio
GOOS
2.75
LIND
-3.72
P/S Ratio
GOOS
0.78
LIND
1.62
EV/EBITDA
GOOS
13.22
LIND
15.59

Profitability

Gross Margin
GOOS
70.19%
LIND
45.78%
Operating Margin
GOOS
28.83%
LIND
0.11%
Profit Margin
GOOS
1.47%
LIND
-3.85%
ROE
GOOS
4.18%
LIND
--
ROA
GOOS
2.7%
LIND
3.52%

Growth

Revenue Growth
GOOS
14.2%
LIND
23.3%
Earnings Growth
GOOS
-4.2%
LIND
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
GOOS
1.3
LIND
--
Current Ratio
GOOS
2.12
LIND
0.8
Quick Ratio
GOOS
1.18
LIND
0.56

Dividends

Dividend Yield
GOOS
--
LIND
--
Payout Ratio
GOOS
0.0%
LIND
0.0%

AI Verdict

GOOS BEARISH

Despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating solid operational health, GOOS is fundamentally overvalued relative to its deterministic baselines, with a Graham Number of $3.92 and an Intrinsic Value of $1.12. The company exhibits a severe disconnect between its high gross margins (70.19%) and its dismal net profit margin (1.47%), compounded by a disastrous recent earnings track record (0/4 beats in the last year). With a bearish technical trend and a current price ($11.71) significantly above both the analyst target ($10.00) and fair value models, the risk-reward profile is unfavorable.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (7/9) indicating operational stability
Impressive Gross Margin of 70.19%
Consistent Revenue Growth (14.20% YoY)
Risks
Severe earnings disappointment (0/4 beats in last 4 quarters)
Extreme valuation gap between current price and Graham/Intrinsic values
Very low net profit margin (1.47%) despite high operating margins
LIND NEUTRAL

LIND presents a high-risk profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but mediocre financial health. While the company exhibits strong top-line momentum with 23.3% YoY revenue growth, it is fundamentally fragile, evidenced by a negative Price-to-Book ratio (-3.72) and poor liquidity (Current Ratio 0.80). The stock has experienced a massive 137.9% 1-year rally, resulting in an expensive Forward P/E of 68.31 that is not yet supported by consistent net profitability. A stark divergence exists between the 'Strong Buy' analyst consensus and the aggressive insider selling pattern.

Strengths
Strong top-line growth with 23.3% YoY and 23.26% Q/Q revenue increases
Robust Gross Margin of 45.78% indicating strong pricing power in expedition travel
Significant price momentum with a 137.9% increase over the last year
Risks
Negative Book Value (P/B -3.72) indicating significant accumulated deficits
Liquidity risk with a Current Ratio of 0.80 and Quick Ratio of 0.56
Extreme valuation with a Forward P/E of 68.31 relative to negative profit margins

Compare Another Pair

GOOS vs LIND: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS) and Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile