No connection

Search Results

GWW vs TRI

GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$926.21
Market Cap
$44.46B
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
75%
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$94.91
Market Cap
$42.04B
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
GWW
25.97
TRI
28.85
Forward P/E
GWW
22.0
TRI
18.85
P/B Ratio
GWW
12.39
TRI
3.58
P/S Ratio
GWW
2.5
TRI
5.62
EV/EBITDA
GWW
15.66
TRI
21.07

Profitability

Gross Margin
GWW
39.09%
TRI
39.22%
Operating Margin
GWW
15.18%
TRI
26.58%
Profit Margin
GWW
9.75%
TRI
20.09%
ROE
GWW
46.72%
TRI
12.4%
ROA
GWW
18.96%
TRI
6.68%

Growth

Revenue Growth
GWW
6.1%
TRI
5.2%
Earnings Growth
GWW
-38.0%
TRI
-42.6%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
GWW
0.69
TRI
0.2
Current Ratio
GWW
2.72
TRI
0.64
Quick Ratio
GWW
1.46
TRI
0.53

Dividends

Dividend Yield
GWW
0.98%
TRI
2.76%
Payout Ratio
GWW
24.16%
TRI
72.34%

AI Verdict

GWW NEUTRAL

W.W. Grainger (GWW) trades at a premium valuation with solid long-term profitability and financial health, but faces near-term headwinds reflected in declining earnings growth and negative price momentum over the past year. Despite a robust ROE of 46.72% and strong liquidity, YoY earnings have contracted sharply (-38%), and insider selling adds caution. The stock is down 20.5% over the past year, underperforming peers like NSC, though it maintains a disciplined capital structure and sustainable dividend. Analysts are tepid with a 'hold' consensus and a 14.2% upside to the $1,054.60 target, suggesting limited near-term catalysts despite attractive relative metrics in some areas.

Strengths
Exceptional ROE of 46.72% significantly outpaces sector average of 31.90%, indicating superior capital efficiency
Strong financial health with Debt/Equity of 0.69 well below sector average of 1.44 and Current Ratio of 2.72
Attractive dividend profile with a low 24.16% payout ratio supporting long-term sustainability
Risks
Earnings contraction of -38.00% YoY raises concerns about margin pressures or cyclical exposure
High Price/Book of 12.39 and P/E of 25.97 exceed sector averages (P/E 31.89 but PB typically lower), increasing vulnerability to multiple compression
Insider selling activity in the last six months signals lack of confidence from executives
TRI NEUTRAL

TRI presents a stark contrast between operational health and valuation; while the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates strong internal financial health, the stock is trading at a massive premium to its Graham Number ($44.31) and Intrinsic Value ($23.03). A severe contraction in earnings growth (-42.6% YoY) and a high PEG ratio of 6.25 suggest the current price is not supported by current fundamentals. However, the company maintains a very conservative debt profile (Debt/Equity 0.20) and continues to receive bullish analyst support. The overall outlook is neutral as the operational strength provides a floor, but the valuation gap and earnings decline create significant headwinds.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (7/9) indicating robust operational health
Very low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.20
Healthy operating margins of 26.58%
Risks
Severe earnings collapse with YoY growth at -42.60%
Significant overvaluation relative to deterministic fair value models
Poor short-term liquidity indicated by a Current Ratio of 0.64

Compare Another Pair

GWW vs TRI: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile