HCM vs LMAT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
HCM presents a contradictory profile: it is fundamentally undervalued based on deterministic metrics, with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 (Stable) and a current price ($15.24) well below both its Graham Number ($20.72) and Intrinsic Value ($18.55). However, the company's operational health is concerning, characterized by negative revenue growth (-16.5%) and a severe collapse in earnings (-98.1% YoY). While the balance sheet is exceptionally strong with very low debt and high liquidity, the core business is currently unprofitable at the operating level. The investment case relies on a turnaround or a catalyst to realize the analyst target price of $22.85.
LMAT exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and exceptional liquidity, but it is currently facing a severe valuation disconnect. While the company shows strong growth (41.4% earnings growth) and high gross margins, the current price of $114.62 significantly exceeds both the Graham Number ($31.3) and the growth-based Intrinsic Value ($74.34). This premium is further complicated by heavy insider selling, including a large divestment by the CEO, and a bearish technical trend despite the price being near 52-week highs.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
HCM vs LMAT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM) and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.