No connection

Search Results

LEE vs TMUS

LEE
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
BEARISH
Price
$8.45
Market Cap
$187.8M
Sector
Communication Services
AI Confidence
85%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$204.25
Market Cap
$228.5B
Sector
Communication Services
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
LEE
--
TMUS
21.02
Forward P/E
LEE
14.82
TMUS
14.53
P/B Ratio
LEE
-1.08
TMUS
3.82
P/S Ratio
LEE
0.34
TMUS
2.59
EV/EBITDA
LEE
13.76
TMUS
10.65

Profitability

Gross Margin
LEE
60.33%
TMUS
63.17%
Operating Margin
LEE
6.24%
TMUS
18.37%
Profit Margin
LEE
-4.83%
TMUS
12.45%
ROE
LEE
--
TMUS
18.18%
ROA
LEE
3.22%
TMUS
5.68%

Growth

Revenue Growth
LEE
-10.0%
TMUS
11.3%
Earnings Growth
LEE
--
TMUS
-26.6%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
LEE
--
TMUS
2.09
Current Ratio
LEE
0.74
TMUS
1.0
Quick Ratio
LEE
0.57
TMUS
0.67

Dividends

Dividend Yield
LEE
--
TMUS
1.94%
Payout Ratio
LEE
0.0%
TMUS
37.65%

AI Verdict

LEE BEARISH

Lee Enterprises presents a high-risk profile characterized by a stable Piotroski F-Score (5/9) that masks severe underlying financial distress. The company suffers from negative shareholder equity (Price/Book: -1.08) and critical liquidity issues with a current ratio of 0.74. Despite a recent 6-month price surge, the fundamental trajectory is sharply negative, evidenced by a -10% revenue decline and catastrophic earnings misses over the last four quarters. The lack of a Graham Number or Intrinsic Value calculation reflects the absence of positive earnings and book value, rendering traditional value metrics inapplicable.

Strengths
Positive operating margin (6.24%) suggesting core business still generates some cash
Strong gross margin (60.33%)
Very low Price/Sales ratio (0.34) indicating deep valuation discount
Risks
Negative Book Value (P/B -1.08) indicating liabilities exceed assets
Severe liquidity risk with Current Ratio (0.74) and Quick Ratio (0.57) below 1.0
Consistent earnings failure (0/4 beats in last 4 quarters with massive negative surprises)
TMUS NEUTRAL

TMUS shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.

Strengths
Strong ROE of 18.2%
Risks
Premium vs Graham Number ($108.15)
High debt burden with D/E of 2.09

Compare Another Pair

LEE vs TMUS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile