LUMN vs TMUS
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Lumen Technologies exhibits severe financial distress, anchored by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio of -7.98, which indicates negative shareholders' equity. While the stock has experienced a speculative 1-year price surge of 143.4%, this is decoupled from fundamentals characterized by negative revenue growth (-8.70%) and negative profit margins (-14.02%). The absence of a Graham Number and the bearish technical trend (0/100) further underscore a high-risk profile. Current pricing ($8.69) sits above the analyst target price ($7.67), suggesting the stock is currently overvalued relative to its distressed state.
TMUS presents a complex profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but not strong financial health. While the stock trades at a significant premium to its Graham Number ($108.15) and Intrinsic Value ($68.04), it maintains an attractive PEG ratio of 0.73 and strong double-digit revenue growth. However, a sharp contraction in earnings growth (-26.6% YoY) combined with a 0/100 technical trend and bearish insider selling suggests significant short-term headwinds despite bullish analyst targets.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
LUMN vs TMUS: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.