MLM vs MT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
MLM exhibits a stable but mediocre financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and no available Altman Z-Score. The stock is severely overvalued, trading at $612.85, which is more than double its Graham Number ($247.45) and over five times its growth-based intrinsic value ($114.52). While revenue shows modest growth, earnings are trending downward both YoY (-4.10%) and Q/Q (-5.10%), creating a dangerous disconnect between price and fundamental performance. The bearish technical trend (0/100) further suggests a lack of market momentum to support these premium valuations.
ArcelorMittal presents a complex profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a current price ($55.92) trading very close to its Graham Number ($57.52). While valuation metrics like the PEG ratio (0.42) and Forward P/E (8.34) are highly attractive, there is a significant disconnect between the current price and the growth-based intrinsic value ($28.77). The company shows strong recovery in EPS growth, but a negative operating margin (-5.10%) suggests fundamental inefficiencies or cyclical headwinds that offset the positive net profit margin.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
MLM vs MT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.