NYT vs TTD
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The New York Times Company exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and an exceptionally low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.02. However, the stock is severely overvalued, trading at $79.03 despite a Graham Number of $24.36 and an Intrinsic Value of $32.50. This valuation gap is exacerbated by a high PEG ratio of 3.79 and a bearish technical trend (10/100). While earnings beats are consistent, the combination of insider selling by the CEO and CFO and a current price exceeding the analyst target price ($74.11) suggests a significant downside risk.
The Trade Desk presents a dichotomy between strong operational efficiency and poor market sentiment. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable financial health and the balance sheet is lean with a low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.18, the stock has suffered a catastrophic long-term price decline (-66% over 5 years). Valuation is mixed: it trades significantly above its Graham Number ($10.28) and Intrinsic Value ($16.43), yet its Forward P/E (10.11) and PEG Ratio (0.86) suggest it is undervalued relative to its growth trajectory. The combination of bearish insider activity and poor technical trends offsets the strong margins and analyst 'buy' recommendations.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
NYT vs TTD: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares The New York Times Company (NYT) and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.