No connection

Search Results

WULF vs XP

WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$20.37
Market Cap
$9.98B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
95%
XP
XP Inc.
BULLISH
Price
$19.63
Market Cap
$10.15B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
WULF
--
XP
10.12
Forward P/E
WULF
5092.5
XP
7.93
P/B Ratio
WULF
60.99
XP
2.16
P/S Ratio
WULF
59.24
XP
0.57
EV/EBITDA
WULF
-130.71
XP
--

Profitability

Gross Margin
WULF
50.93%
XP
69.26%
Operating Margin
WULF
-210.53%
XP
31.5%
Profit Margin
WULF
0.0%
XP
29.09%
ROE
WULF
-343.69%
XP
23.71%
ROA
WULF
-2.55%
XP
1.39%

Growth

Revenue Growth
WULF
2.4%
XP
13.3%
Earnings Growth
WULF
--
XP
14.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
WULF
36.99
XP
6.31
Current Ratio
WULF
2.0
XP
1.34
Quick Ratio
WULF
1.88
XP
1.3

Dividends

Dividend Yield
WULF
--
XP
0.92%
Payout Ratio
WULF
0.0%
XP
10.15%

AI Verdict

WULF BEARISH

TeraWulf exhibits critical financial instability, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating severe deterioration in fundamental health. The company's valuation is completely detached from its operational reality, with a Price/Sales ratio of 59.24 and a Forward P/E of 5092.50 despite an operating margin of -210.53%. While analysts maintain a 'strong_buy' rating and historical price action has been explosive, the combination of catastrophic EPS growth (-800% YoY) and significant insider selling by the CEO and CFO suggests a speculative bubble.

Strengths
Strong historical 1-year price appreciation (+630.1%)
Positive gross margin of 50.93%
Healthy short-term liquidity with a current ratio of 2.00
Risks
Extreme valuation multiples (P/B 60.99, P/S 59.24) indicating massive overvaluation
Severe operational inefficiency with an operating margin of -210.53%
Critical financial health as evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9
XP BULLISH

XP Inc. exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and financial stability. The stock is significantly undervalued, trading at $19.63, which is slightly below its Graham Number ($20.01) and far below its growth-based intrinsic value ($55.17). While the technical trend is currently bearish and insider sentiment is lukewarm, the combination of a low P/E (10.12), high ROE (23.71%), and consistent earnings growth makes it a compelling value play. The company's ability to maintain high profit margins (29.09%) while growing revenue by 13.3% YoY suggests a strong competitive moat in the capital markets sector.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (7/9) indicating high financial health
Highly attractive valuation with a P/E of 10.12 vs sector average of 40.82
Exceptional ROE of 23.71%, vastly outperforming the sector average
Risks
High Debt/Equity ratio (6.31), though typical for financial services
Bearish technical trend (0/100) suggesting short-term price pressure
Low insider sentiment (40/100) indicating lack of internal conviction

Compare Another Pair

WULF vs XP: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and XP Inc. (XP) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile