ACA vs LSTR
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The company exhibits a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and lacks an Altman Z-Score to confirm safety from distress. Despite strong recent earnings growth (YoY EPS +71.4%, Earnings Growth YoY +335.3%) and solid revenue momentum (24.60% YoY), elevated valuation metrics (P/E 38.61 vs. sector avg 55.59) and bearish insider activity weigh on near-term outlook. The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number of $59.01, suggesting overvaluation for defensive investors, though growth investors may justify the premium. Analysts maintain a strong_buy consensus, but insider selling and modest dividend strength temper enthusiasm.
LSTR exhibits a severe valuation disconnect, trading at $168.27 despite a Graham Number of $41.71 and an Intrinsic Value of $23.17. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable financial health and the low Debt/Equity ratio (0.17) provides a safety buffer, these are overshadowed by crashing fundamentals. With YoY earnings growth at -46.50% and revenue declining, the current P/E of 50.84 is unsustainable. The bearish technical trend (10/100) and analyst target price ($152.27) further suggest significant downside risk.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ACA vs LSTR: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.