ACMR vs DBD
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ACMR's Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates severe financial distress, with weak operational and profitability health. The Altman Z-Score is unavailable, but the company's negative earnings growth (-77.7% YoY) and declining EPS trend signal deteriorating fundamentals. Despite a strong gross margin (44.39%) and low debt/equity (0.15), the sharp drop in earnings and poor recent earnings surprises (average -20.81% over last 4 quarters) undermine confidence. The stock trades at a premium to its Graham Number ($26.23) and intrinsic value ($9.59), suggesting overvaluation relative to conservative metrics. Insider selling of $16.59M in the last 6 months further reinforces bearish sentiment.
DBD presents a stark dichotomy between explosive earnings growth and concerning sentiment indicators. With a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, the company's financial health is categorized as stable but lacks strong momentum. While the stock currently trades at a premium to its Graham Number ($42.15) and Intrinsic Value ($74.93), the low forward P/E of 12.75 suggests the market is pricing in continued earnings acceleration. However, heavy insider liquidation and a bearish technical trend significantly offset the strong analyst 'strong_buy' consensus.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ACMR vs DBD: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.