AG vs NEM
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The company exhibits weak financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal stability, and lacks an Altman Z-Score, raising concerns about financial distress risk. Despite strong recent price performance and robust revenue growth (95.10% YoY), the stock appears significantly overvalued with a P/E of 169.60 versus sector average of 26.34 and a Graham Number of just $4.23, far below the current price of $25.44. Earnings quality is poor, with a track record of missing estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters and an average surprise of -24.17%. While balance sheet metrics like low debt/equity (0.08) and strong liquidity (current ratio 3.38) are positives, weak ROE (4.21%) and inconsistent profitability undermine long-term value creation.
NEM shows bullish fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Key strengths include strong valuation and growth metrics. Price trades at a 155.7% premium to fair value estimate ($44.73), limiting near-term upside from a valuation perspective.
Compare Another Pair
AG vs NEM: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.