AG vs BHP
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The company exhibits weak financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal stability, and lacks an Altman Z-Score, raising concerns about financial distress risk. Despite strong recent price performance and robust revenue growth (95.10% YoY), the stock appears significantly overvalued with a P/E of 169.60 versus sector average of 26.34 and a Graham Number of just $4.23, far below the current price of $25.44. Earnings quality is poor, with a track record of missing estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters and an average surprise of -24.17%. While balance sheet metrics like low debt/equity (0.08) and strong liquidity (current ratio 3.38) are positives, weak ROE (4.21%) and inconsistent profitability undermine long-term value creation.
BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.
Compare Another Pair
AG vs BHP: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.