AGI vs RGLD
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile: the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates borderline financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. Despite strong profitability metrics and robust earnings growth, elevated valuation multiples and inconsistent quarterly earnings surprises weigh on sustainability. The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number of $16.89 and near the intrinsic value of $38.94, suggesting limited margin of safety. Analysts maintain a strong_buy consensus, but technical trend and insider sentiment are weak, indicating caution despite favorable sector-relative fundamentals.
RGLD presents a dichotomy between a rock-solid balance sheet and an extreme valuation premium. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable financial health, supported by a very low Debt/Equity ratio (0.13) and strong liquidity. However, the current price of $268.12 trades at a massive premium to both the Graham Number ($113.0) and the Intrinsic Value ($46.9). While revenue growth is explosive (86.1%), the negative earnings growth (-28.9%) and recent string of earnings misses suggest the current valuation is speculative and disconnected from fundamental growth.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AGI vs RGLD: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.