ALB vs FCX
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating significant deterioration in fundamental performance. Despite a strong recent price run-up (+115.4% over 1Y), the company is unprofitable (negative profit and operating margins), has negative earnings growth (YoY), and trades at an extremely high forward P/E of 82.85. While the balance sheet shows a healthy current ratio and manageable debt/equity of 0.37, the lack of Altman Z-Score and Graham Number, combined with deteriorating profitability and insider selling, raises serious concerns about sustainability. The analyst target price of $165.06 implies 13% downside from current levels, reinforcing overvaluation relative to fundamentals.
FCX shows bearish fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Concerns include weak profitability or high valuation.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ALB vs FCX: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.