ALGT vs CAT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ALGT's Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates severe financial distress, with weak profitability, declining ROE, and negative earnings despite modest revenue growth. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, especially given a high debt/equity ratio of 1.77 and current ratio below 1.0. While forward P/E of 7.19 and price/sales of 0.53 suggest undervaluation, the company's negative profit margin (-1.71%) and inconsistent earnings performance undermine fundamental strength. Insider selling totaling $34.37M in six months further signals lack of confidence. Despite a strong analyst 'buy' consensus, the underlying financial health and valuation contradictions point to significant risk.
CAT shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ALGT vs CAT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.