No connection

Search Results

AMWD vs BABA

AMWD
American Woodmark Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$39.50
Market Cap
$575.5M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AMWD
34.05
BABA
23.6
Forward P/E
AMWD
21.99
BABA
19.5
P/B Ratio
AMWD
0.64
BABA
2.71
P/S Ratio
AMWD
0.38
BABA
0.41
EV/EBITDA
AMWD
8.07
BABA
20.1

Profitability

Gross Margin
AMWD
15.33%
BABA
41.17%
Operating Margin
AMWD
-0.17%
BABA
2.17%
Profit Margin
AMWD
1.15%
BABA
12.19%
ROE
AMWD
1.93%
BABA
11.19%
ROA
AMWD
2.7%
BABA
4.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AMWD
-18.4%
BABA
4.8%
Earnings Growth
AMWD
--
BABA
-51.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AMWD
0.54
BABA
0.27
Current Ratio
AMWD
2.37
BABA
1.46
Quick Ratio
AMWD
0.88
BABA
0.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AMWD
--
BABA
0.59%
Payout Ratio
AMWD
0.0%
BABA
14.4%

AI Verdict

AMWD BEARISH

American Woodmark Corporation exhibits strong deterministic health per its Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and financial stability. However, this is severely undermined by a catastrophic earnings trajectory, with year-over-year EPS growth of -287.6% and a recent quarterly surprise of -5728.6%, signaling deep operational distress. The stock trades near its 52-week low at $39.50, despite a Graham Number of $40.20, suggesting minimal margin of safety. Its valuation metrics—P/E of 34.05 and Price/Sales of 0.38—are misleading given the negative operating margin and declining revenue. Analysts recommend 'buy' with a target of $59.00, but this is inconsistent with the deteriorating fundamentals and technical bearishness.

Strengths
Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong financial health and operational efficiency
High current ratio (2.37) and moderate debt/equity (0.54) suggest liquidity and manageable leverage
Graham Number ($40.20) implies a defensive fair value close to current price
Risks
Revenue growth declined sharply by -18.40% YoY, signaling weakening demand
Operating margin is negative (-0.17%), indicating core business inefficiency
Recent earnings surprises are extremely negative, with a -5728.6% miss in Q4 2026
BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins

Compare Another Pair

AMWD vs BABA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile