APOG vs HTLD
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
APOG exhibits exceptional financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, indicating strong operational efficiency and balance sheet stability. While the current price of $38.29 is slightly above the Graham Number ($31.86), it trades at a significant discount to its growth-based intrinsic value of $55.17 and a very attractive forward P/E of 10.73. Despite stagnant revenue growth and a bearish technical trend, the company's consistent track record of earnings beats and conservative debt-to-equity ratio (0.56) provide a strong margin of safety. The combination of deep value and high deterministic health makes this a compelling long-term play.
HTLD presents a concerning fundamental profile characterized by a stable Piotroski F-Score (6/9) that masks a severe operational collapse. While the balance sheet remains clean with very low debt (D/E 0.21), the company is suffering from catastrophic revenue contraction (-26.10% YoY) and consistent earnings misses. The recent short-term price rally is disconnected from the underlying business reality, as the company has transitioned from a profitable entity to one with negative margins and plummeting EPS. With a current price ($11.01) exceeding the analyst target price ($10.00), the risk-reward profile is unfavorable.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
APOG vs HTLD: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) and Heartland Express, Inc. (HTLD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.