No connection

Search Results

APTV vs BABA

APTV
Aptiv PLC
NEUTRAL
Price
$76.47
Market Cap
$16.65B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
72%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
APTV
58.82
BABA
23.6
Forward P/E
APTV
9.01
BABA
19.5
P/B Ratio
APTV
1.78
BABA
2.71
P/S Ratio
APTV
0.83
BABA
0.41
EV/EBITDA
APTV
7.28
BABA
20.1

Profitability

Gross Margin
APTV
19.41%
BABA
41.17%
Operating Margin
APTV
11.43%
BABA
2.17%
Profit Margin
APTV
1.46%
BABA
12.19%
ROE
APTV
3.29%
BABA
11.19%
ROA
APTV
5.77%
BABA
4.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth
APTV
7.4%
BABA
4.8%
Earnings Growth
APTV
--
BABA
-51.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
APTV
0.85
BABA
0.27
Current Ratio
APTV
1.79
BABA
1.46
Quick Ratio
APTV
1.22
BABA
0.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield
APTV
--
BABA
0.59%
Payout Ratio
APTV
0.0%
BABA
14.4%

AI Verdict

APTV NEUTRAL

The deterministic health scores present a mixed picture: the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but not strong financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. Despite a high current P/E of 58.82, the forward P/E of 9.01 suggests strong earnings growth expectations. The company beats earnings estimates consistently, with a 3/4 beat rate over the last four quarters and an average surprise of 14.89%, yet insider selling and weak long-term price performance raise caution. While analysts are bullish with a $101.81 target price and a 'buy' recommendation, the stock trades at a significant premium to the Graham Number of $35.41, implying high valuation risk.

Strengths
Consistent earnings beat rate (3 out of last 4 quarters) with strong average surprise of 14.89%
Robust year-over-year EPS growth of 18.6% and revenue growth of 7.40%
Forward P/E of 9.01 indicates strong future earnings expectations relative to current P/E of 58.82
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests only moderate financial health, limiting confidence in stability
Current P/E of 58.82 is significantly above forward P/E and sector average, indicating potential overvaluation
Stock trades at more than double the Graham Number ($35.41) and well above intrinsic value estimate of $9.10
BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins

Compare Another Pair

APTV vs BABA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Aptiv PLC (APTV) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile