AQN vs MGEE
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The deterministic health scores indicate significant concerns, with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signaling borderline financial stability and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. Despite a recent 1Y price surge of +47.5%, the stock trades at a steep valuation (P/E 91.14 vs sector avg 19.73) while reporting a negative profit margin (-1.11%) and an unsustainable dividend payout ratio (371.43%). However, strong operating metrics like 25.07% operating margin, improving EPS trends (+12.5% YoY), and a 4.06% dividend yield provide some support. The lack of insider activity and mixed analyst sentiment (hold) further justify a cautious stance.
MGEE presents a dichotomy between superior operational efficiency and poor valuation metrics. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable financial health and the company boasts profit margins and ROE significantly above sector averages, the stock is trading at a substantial premium to its Graham Number ($54.65) and Intrinsic Value ($54.50). The technical trend is currently bearish (0/100), and a consistent history of missing earnings estimates suggests limited near-term catalysts for price appreciation despite a conservative debt profile.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AQN vs MGEE: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) and MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.