No connection

Search Results

ASH vs BHP

ASH
Ashland Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$63.32
Market Cap
$2.9B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
68%
BHP
BHP Group Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.52
Market Cap
$173.45B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
ASH
--
BHP
19.07
Forward P/E
ASH
13.53
BHP
15.45
P/B Ratio
ASH
1.53
BHP
7.19
P/S Ratio
ASH
1.59
BHP
3.38
EV/EBITDA
ASH
11.46
BHP
15.39

Profitability

Gross Margin
ASH
33.55%
BHP
82.21%
Operating Margin
ASH
14.26%
BHP
37.7%
Profit Margin
ASH
-46.33%
BHP
17.59%
ROE
ASH
-34.45%
BHP
21.99%
ROA
ASH
2.05%
BHP
11.02%

Growth

Revenue Growth
ASH
-8.6%
BHP
-8.2%
Earnings Growth
ASH
135.6%
BHP
-34.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
ASH
0.78
BHP
0.49
Current Ratio
ASH
2.85
BHP
1.46
Quick Ratio
ASH
1.05
BHP
1.06

Dividends

Dividend Yield
ASH
2.63%
BHP
3.26%
Payout Ratio
ASH
40.0%
BHP
69.9%

AI Verdict

ASH BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a deeply concerning financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating severe weakness in fundamental health. Despite a reasonable forward P/E of 13.53 and a 2.63% dividend yield, the company is plagued by a negative profit margin (-46.33%) and ROE (-34.45%), driven by a catastrophic earnings miss in Q3 2025. While the technical trend shows short-term recovery (+25.4% over 6M), long-term performance remains weak (-38.5% over 3Y), and analyst targets offer only marginal upside. Persistent earnings disappointment, lack of insider support, and deteriorating profitability undermine any value proposition.

Strengths
Forward P/E of 13.53 is below sector average, suggesting potential value
Current Ratio of 2.85 indicates strong short-term liquidity
Dividend yield of 2.63% is sustainable with a 40% payout ratio
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals critical financial distress and poor earnings quality
Profit Margin of -46.33% and ROE of -34.45% reflect severe profitability collapse
Catastrophic earnings surprise of -1801.6% in Q3 2025 indicates high volatility and risk
BHP NEUTRAL

BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.

Strengths
High operating margin of 37.70% indicates strong cost control and pricing power
ROE of 21.99% exceeds sector average significantly, signaling efficient equity use
Debt/Equity of 0.49 is below sector average of 0.63, indicating conservative leverage
Risks
Revenue growth down 8.20% YoY and earnings down 34.00%, indicating deteriorating fundamentals
P/E of 19.07 is high relative to earnings contraction, increasing valuation risk
Price/Book of 7.19 is extremely elevated, suggesting overvaluation relative to book value

Compare Another Pair

ASH vs BHP: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Ashland Inc. (ASH) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile