No connection

Search Results

ASTL vs BHP

ASTL
Algoma Steel Group Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$4.54
Market Cap
$476.4M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
85%
BHP
BHP Group Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.52
Market Cap
$173.45B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
ASTL
--
BHP
19.07
Forward P/E
ASTL
-2.66
BHP
15.45
P/B Ratio
ASTL
0.75
BHP
7.19
P/S Ratio
ASTL
0.22
BHP
3.38
EV/EBITDA
ASTL
-2.85
BHP
15.39

Profitability

Gross Margin
ASTL
-18.3%
BHP
82.21%
Operating Margin
ASTL
-26.86%
BHP
37.7%
Profit Margin
ASTL
-34.79%
BHP
17.59%
ROE
ASTL
--
BHP
21.99%
ROA
ASTL
--
BHP
11.02%

Growth

Revenue Growth
ASTL
-12.7%
BHP
-8.2%
Earnings Growth
ASTL
--
BHP
-34.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
ASTL
0.85
BHP
0.49
Current Ratio
ASTL
2.29
BHP
1.46
Quick Ratio
ASTL
0.66
BHP
1.06

Dividends

Dividend Yield
ASTL
3.42%
BHP
3.26%
Payout Ratio
ASTL
38.54%
BHP
69.9%

AI Verdict

ASTL BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, indicating borderline stability, and a missing Altman Z-Score, which raises uncertainty around solvency risk. The company is unprofitable across all margins—gross, operating, and net—while reporting negative revenue growth and deeply negative earnings surprises. Valuation metrics appear deceptively cheap with a Price/Book of 0.75 and Price/Sales of 0.22, but these are misleading given the firm's deteriorating fundamentals and lack of earnings power. Despite a 3.42% dividend yield, the poor earnings coverage and declining cash flows cast doubt on sustainability, especially with a technical trend scoring 0/100 indicating strong bearish momentum.

Strengths
Current Ratio of 2.29 suggests short-term liquidity is manageable
Dividend yield of 3.42% is above sector average and may attract income seekers
Price/Sales of 0.22 and Price/Book of 0.75 indicate potential deep value if turnaround occurs
Risks
Profit Margin of -34.79% and Gross Margin of -18.30% indicate severe operational distress
Revenue Growth (YoY) of -12.70% reflects declining demand or competitive pressures
Forward P/E of -2.66 confirms lack of near-term profitability, increasing valuation risk
BHP NEUTRAL

BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.

Strengths
High operating margin of 37.70% indicates strong cost control and pricing power
ROE of 21.99% exceeds sector average significantly, signaling efficient equity use
Debt/Equity of 0.49 is below sector average of 0.63, indicating conservative leverage
Risks
Revenue growth down 8.20% YoY and earnings down 34.00%, indicating deteriorating fundamentals
P/E of 19.07 is high relative to earnings contraction, increasing valuation risk
Price/Book of 7.19 is extremely elevated, suggesting overvaluation relative to book value

Compare Another Pair

ASTL vs BHP: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Algoma Steel Group Inc. (ASTL) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile