AVA vs HTO
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. AVA trades near its analyst target price of $41.00 and slightly below the growth-based intrinsic value of $69.62, but well above the conservative Graham Number of $41.55. Strong recent earnings growth (YoY +56.4%) and a high dividend yield (4.83%) are offset by declining earnings estimate accuracy, insider selling, and weak technical momentum. Relative to sector peers, AVA has below-average revenue growth and profitability but a more stable payout and moderate leverage.
HTO presents a concerning divergence between its market price and fundamental performance. While the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, the company is suffering from severe growth decay with YoY earnings plummeting by 34.40% and revenue contracting. The stock is currently trading near its 52-week high ($59.67) despite being significantly overvalued relative to its intrinsic value ($20.44) and slightly above its Graham Number ($52.94). With bearish insider sentiment and poor liquidity ratios, the current valuation appears unsustainable.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AVA vs HTO: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Avista Corporation (AVA) and H2O America (HTO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.