AXGN vs AZN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AXGN exhibits a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and lacks an Altman Z-Score, limiting distress risk assessment. Despite strong revenue growth of 23.5% and improving profitability trends, the company remains unprofitable on a net basis with negative ROE and no meaningful cash flow data. Valuation metrics are stretched, with a high forward P/E of 65.88 and a Price/Book of 12.53, while insider selling of $10.58M in the last six months raises caution. Analysts maintain a strong_buy recommendation, but recent earnings volatility and lack of profitability temper bullish sentiment.
AstraZeneca's deterministic health score is concerning with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial stability. While profitability metrics like ROE (21.67%) and gross margin (83.26%) are strong, the current price of $92.95 trades significantly above the Graham Number of $45.06, reflecting high growth expectations. Revenue and earnings growth are robust (12% and 78% YoY, respectively), but recent earnings surprises have been volatile, including a -25.9% miss in Q3 2025. Analysts maintain a strong_buy recommendation, though insider selling and weak technical trends (10/100) suggest caution near-term.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AXGN vs AZN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Axogen, Inc. (AXGN) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.