No connection

Search Results

AZO vs BABA

AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$3700.00
Market Cap
$61.54B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AZO
25.77
BABA
23.6
Forward P/E
AZO
21.15
BABA
19.5
P/B Ratio
AZO
-19.01
BABA
2.71
P/S Ratio
AZO
3.19
BABA
0.41
EV/EBITDA
AZO
17.56
BABA
20.1

Profitability

Gross Margin
AZO
52.15%
BABA
41.17%
Operating Margin
AZO
16.94%
BABA
2.17%
Profit Margin
AZO
12.78%
BABA
12.19%
ROE
AZO
--
BABA
11.19%
ROA
AZO
11.96%
BABA
4.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AZO
8.2%
BABA
4.8%
Earnings Growth
AZO
-4.6%
BABA
-51.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AZO
--
BABA
0.27
Current Ratio
AZO
0.86
BABA
1.46
Quick Ratio
AZO
0.1
BABA
0.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AZO
--
BABA
0.59%
Payout Ratio
AZO
0.0%
BABA
14.4%

AI Verdict

AZO NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. Despite solid profitability metrics like a 16.94% operating margin and 52.15% gross margin, recent earnings declines and negative earnings surprises over the last four quarters raise concerns. Valuation appears stretched relative to peers with a P/E of 25.77, though below sector average, while insider selling and weakening EPS growth temper bullish sentiment. The stock trades significantly above its intrinsic value estimate of $1,004.92, suggesting substantial premium pricing based on growth expectations.

Strengths
High gross margin of 52.15% indicates strong pricing power and cost control
Operating margin of 16.94% exceeds sector average, reflecting operational efficiency
Revenue growth of 8.20% YoY outpaces peer and sector averages
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals weak financial health, particularly concerning given declining earnings trends
Negative YoY earnings growth of -4.6% and sharp Q/Q EPS decline of -36.3% indicate deteriorating profitability
Price-to-Book ratio of -19.01 suggests negative book value, a serious accounting red flag
BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins

Compare Another Pair

AZO vs BABA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile