No connection

Search Results

BABA vs BGSI

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BGSI
Boyd Group Services Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$161.62
Market Cap
$4.59B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
BGSI
218.41
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
BGSI
39.13
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
BGSI
4.09
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
BGSI
1.48
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
BGSI
20.92

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
BGSI
46.29%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
BGSI
4.68%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
BGSI
0.52%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
BGSI
1.9%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
BGSI
2.84%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
BGSI
5.0%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
BGSI
284.6%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
BGSI
1.59
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
BGSI
0.69
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
BGSI
0.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
BGSI
0.28%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
BGSI
58.82%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
BGSI BEARISH

BGSI's Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, signaling deterioration in operational efficiency and profitability trends. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about bankruptcy risk, especially given a high debt/equity ratio of 1.59 and a current ratio of 0.69, both below safe thresholds. Despite strong earnings growth (284.6% YoY), the company trades at a stretched forward P/E of 39.13 and a current P/E of 218.41, far exceeding sector averages and intrinsic value estimates. The Graham Number ($25.65) and intrinsic value ($21.83) suggest significant overvaluation, with the current price of $161.62 implying a premium driven by speculative growth expectations. Technical trends are bearish, and insider activity is neutral, further undermining confidence.

Strengths
Strong revenue growth of 5.00% YoY
Significant earnings growth of 284.60% YoY
High gross margin of 46.29% indicates pricing power or cost control
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health and declining operational efficiency
No Altman Z-Score available; high debt/equity (1.59) and low current ratio (0.69) suggest liquidity and solvency risk
Current price ($161.62) is vastly above Graham Number ($25.65) and intrinsic value ($21.83), indicating severe overvaluation

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs BGSI: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile