No connection

Search Results

BABA vs BIRD

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$4.14
Market Cap
$34.0M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
88%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
BIRD
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
BIRD
-0.54
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
BIRD
0.65
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
BIRD
0.21
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
BIRD
-0.72

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
BIRD
38.77%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
BIRD
-58.07%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
BIRD
-51.9%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
BIRD
-93.02%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
BIRD
-30.16%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
BIRD
-23.3%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
BIRD
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
BIRD
0.83
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
BIRD
2.37
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
BIRD
0.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
BIRD
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
BIRD
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
BIRD BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a critically weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 1/9, indicating severe operational and profitability concerns. Despite a low Price/Book of 0.65 and Price/Sales of 0.21 suggesting potential value, the company is deeply unprofitable with negative margins across all key metrics, including a -51.90% profit margin and -93.02% ROE. Revenue is contracting at -23.30% YoY, and insider selling activity over the past six months signals management's lack of confidence. While analysts have a bullish target price of $14.00, the single analyst coverage, deteriorating fundamentals, and absence of Altman Z-Score due to likely negative retained earnings or equity raise serious distress risks.

Strengths
Low valuation multiples: Price/Sales of 0.21 and Price/Book of 0.65 suggest potential undervaluation relative to book and sales
Gross margin of 38.77% indicates some pricing power or cost control at the product level
Current ratio of 2.37 shows short-term liquidity is not immediately constrained
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 indicates extremely weak financial health and high risk of continued underperformance
Profitability collapse: -51.90% profit margin and -58.07% operating margin reflect unsustainable business model
Revenue declining at -23.30% YoY, indicating weakening demand or competitive pressures

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs BIRD: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile