No connection

Search Results

BABA vs BROS

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BROS
Dutch Bros Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$60.97
Market Cap
$10.04B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
BROS
124.43
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
BROS
68.24
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
BROS
11.8
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
BROS
6.53
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
BROS
33.49

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
BROS
26.33%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
BROS
10.42%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
BROS
4.04%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
BROS
11.68%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
BROS
3.54%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
BROS
25.2%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
BROS
24.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
BROS
1.2
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
BROS
1.52
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
BROS
1.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
BROS
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
BROS
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
BROS NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile: the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates borderline stability, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. Despite strong revenue and earnings growth, elevated valuation multiples—P/E of 124.43 and Price/Book of 11.80—suggest the stock is pricing in aggressive future expectations. Profitability margins and ROE are above sector averages, but insider selling worth over $600M in the last six months raises concern about confidence at the top. Analysts maintain a strong_buy consensus, yet technical trend and recent price performance show weakness, indicating potential near-term headwinds.

Strengths
Strong year-over-year revenue growth of 25.20%, significantly above sector average of 7.83%
High operating leverage with operating margin at 10.42% and gross margin at 26.33%
Consistently beats earnings estimates, with 3 out of last 4 quarters exceeding expectations and an average surprise of 17.60%
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests weak financial health, increasing vulnerability to downturns
Extremely high P/E ratio of 124.43, more than double the sector average of 52.75, implying overvaluation risk
Debt/Equity ratio of 1.20 is high, though below sector average of 1.63, still elevating financial risk

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs BROS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile