No connection

Search Results

BABA vs BYD

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$83.88
Market Cap
$6.32B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
BYD
3.71
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
BYD
10.64
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
BYD
2.46
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
BYD
1.54
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
BYD
7.57

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
BYD
59.36%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
BYD
20.81%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
BYD
45.05%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
BYD
87.79%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
BYD
8.72%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
BYD
2.0%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
BYD
-6.6%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
BYD
1.04
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
BYD
0.54
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
BYD
0.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
BYD
0.83%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
BYD
3.27%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
BYD NEUTRAL

Boyd Gaming (BYD) presents a classic 'value trap' profile, characterized by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and deteriorating earnings growth. While the stock trades at a significant discount to its Graham Number ($131.85) and Intrinsic Value ($158.34), the fundamental health is concerning, evidenced by a low current ratio of 0.54 and negative Q/Q earnings growth of -17.70%. The extreme P/E of 3.71 suggests the market is pricing in a significant decline in future profitability, which is supported by the jump in Forward P/E to 10.64. Despite strong historical profitability margins, the combination of insider selling and poor liquidity offsets the valuation appeal.

Strengths
Extremely low P/E ratio (3.71) relative to sector average (33.34)
High profit margins (45.05%) and exceptional ROE (87.79%)
Trading significantly below Graham Number and Intrinsic Value
Risks
Weak financial health indicated by Piotroski F-Score of 3/9
Poor short-term liquidity with a current ratio of 0.54
Negative earnings growth trend (YoY -6.60%, Q/Q -17.70%)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs BYD: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile