No connection

Search Results

BABA vs KFS

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
KFS
Kingsway Financial Services Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$11.57
Market Cap
$331.2M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
90%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
KFS
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
KFS
--
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
KFS
21.83
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
KFS
2.41
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
KFS
136.67

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
KFS
81.27%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
KFS
-2.36%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
KFS
-7.81%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
KFS
-38.9%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
KFS
-1.83%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
KFS
28.7%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
KFS
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
KFS
2.27
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
KFS
1.13
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
KFS
0.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
KFS
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
KFS
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
KFS BEARISH

KFS exhibits severe financial instability, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating a high probability of continued operational weakness. While the company shows strong top-line revenue growth of 28.7%, this is offset by negative profitability (ROE of -38.9%) and a precarious balance sheet with a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.27. The valuation is fundamentally disconnected from performance, evidenced by an extreme Price-to-Book ratio of 21.83. Furthermore, aggressive insider selling by the CEO and CFO suggests a lack of confidence in the current share price.

Strengths
Strong YoY revenue growth of 28.70%
Robust Gross Margin of 81.27%
Positive Q/Q and YoY EPS growth trends
Risks
Critical Piotroski F-Score (1/9) indicating poor financial health
Excessive valuation with a Price-to-Book ratio of 21.83
High leverage with Debt/Equity at 2.27

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs KFS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Kingsway Financial Services Inc. (KFS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile