No connection

Search Results

BABA vs LKQ

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$30.66
Market Cap
$7.82B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
LKQ
13.27
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
LKQ
9.27
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
LKQ
1.2
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
LKQ
0.57
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
LKQ
8.42

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
LKQ
38.57%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
LKQ
6.43%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
LKQ
4.45%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
LKQ
9.48%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
LKQ
4.51%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
LKQ
2.7%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
LKQ
-57.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
LKQ
0.77
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
LKQ
1.67
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
LKQ
0.48

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
LKQ
3.86%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
LKQ
51.95%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
LKQ NEUTRAL

LKQ presents a classic value trap profile: fundamentally cheap but suffering from severe earnings deterioration. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable financial health and the current price ($30.66) sits below the Graham Number ($36.5), the company is grappling with a catastrophic -57.7% YoY earnings collapse. The disconnect between the low P/E (13.27) and the bearish technical trend (0/100) suggests the market is pricing in continued fundamental decay despite analyst optimism.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples (P/E 13.27, P/S 0.57)
Trading below the Graham Number defensive fair value of $36.5
Sustainable dividend yield of 3.86% with a reasonable 51.95% payout ratio
Risks
Severe earnings contraction (-57.7% YoY growth)
Strongly bearish technical trend (0/100 score)
Poor long-term price performance (-26.2% over 5 years)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs LKQ: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile