No connection

Search Results

BABA vs MGM

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
NEUTRAL
Price
$39.27
Market Cap
$10.05B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
MGM
51.67
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
MGM
16.97
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
MGM
4.17
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
MGM
0.57
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
MGM
17.06

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
MGM
44.42%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
MGM
7.06%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
MGM
1.17%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
MGM
14.89%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
MGM
2.0%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
MGM
6.0%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
MGM
115.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
MGM
9.63
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
MGM
1.23
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
MGM
1.03

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
MGM
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
MGM
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
MGM NEUTRAL

MGM presents a dichotomy between explosive earnings recovery and precarious financial leverage. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but mediocre financial health, the company is trading at a significant premium to its Graham Number ($12.68) and Intrinsic Value ($22.42). Massive YoY earnings growth (115.7%) and a favorable PEG ratio (0.97) suggest strong momentum, but these are offset by an alarming Debt/Equity ratio of 9.63 and thin net profit margins.

Strengths
Explosive earnings growth (YoY EPS +115.7%)
Attractive PEG ratio (0.97) suggesting growth justifies valuation
Strong earnings beat track record (3/4 recent quarters)
Risks
Extreme leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 9.63
Very thin net profit margins (1.17%)
Current price ($39.27) is significantly overvalued relative to Graham and Intrinsic baselines

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs MGM: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and MGM Resorts International (MGM) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile