No connection

Search Results

BABA vs MTH

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
MTH
Meritage Homes Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.02
Market Cap
$4.48B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
MTH
12.23
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
MTH
9.94
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
MTH
0.88
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
MTH
0.8
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
MTH
11.19

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
MTH
19.08%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
MTH
5.84%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
MTH
6.86%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
MTH
7.49%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
MTH
3.9%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
MTH
-17.7%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
MTH
-51.5%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
MTH
0.37
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
MTH
14.97
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
MTH
2.15

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
MTH
2.86%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
MTH
32.3%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
MTH NEUTRAL

MTH presents a stark contrast between strong defensive valuation and deteriorating operational health. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health, corroborated by a severe collapse in earnings (-51.50% YoY) and revenue (-17.70% YoY). While the stock trades below book value (P/B 0.88) and below its Graham Number ($96.94), the growth-based intrinsic value of $38.36 suggests the market is pricing in a significant downturn. The combination of bearish insider activity and four consecutive earnings misses offsets the attractive valuation metrics.

Strengths
Trading below book value (P/B 0.88)
Low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.37
Extremely high liquidity (Current Ratio 14.97)
Risks
Severe earnings contraction (-51.50% YoY)
Negative revenue growth trends both YoY and Q/Q
Weak operational efficiency as indicated by Piotroski F-Score (3/9)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs MTH: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile