No connection

Search Results

BABA vs RUSHA

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$73.93
Market Cap
$5.79B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
RUSHA
22.61
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
RUSHA
16.87
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
RUSHA
2.57
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
RUSHA
0.78
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
RUSHA
10.74

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
RUSHA
19.75%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
RUSHA
5.16%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
RUSHA
3.55%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
RUSHA
12.13%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
RUSHA
5.43%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
RUSHA
-11.8%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
RUSHA
-11.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
RUSHA
0.65
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
RUSHA
1.4
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
RUSHA
0.33

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
RUSHA
1.01%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
RUSHA
22.63%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
RUSHA NEUTRAL

RUSHA exhibits strong operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating a robust financial foundation. However, the stock is significantly overvalued, trading at $73.93 despite a Graham Number of $46.02 and an Intrinsic Value of $22.89. While the company has an exceptional track record of beating earnings estimates over 25 quarters, current YoY revenue and earnings growth have turned negative (-11.8% and -11.0% respectively). The combination of a strong balance sheet and consistent execution is currently offset by expensive valuation metrics and bearish insider sentiment.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (7/9) indicating high financial health
Exceptional earnings track record with consistent beats over 25 quarters
Conservative Debt/Equity ratio (0.65) compared to sector average (1.42)
Risks
Significant valuation premium over Graham Number and Intrinsic Value
Negative YoY revenue and earnings growth (-11.8% and -11.0%)
Bearish insider activity with $2.35M in net sales and zero buys

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs RUSHA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile