BHP vs CF
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.
CF Industries presents a dichotomy between strong fundamental profitability and bearish sentiment indicators. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but non-optimal financial health, while the stock trades significantly above its Graham Number ($79.74) but well below its growth-based Intrinsic Value ($264.62). While the company boasts an impressive ROE of 23.40% and a very healthy current ratio of 3.37, these strengths are offset by aggressive insider selling and a high PEG ratio of 5.67, suggesting that current growth may be overpriced.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BHP vs CF: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.