BP vs EC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
BP's Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades at a significant premium to its Graham Number ($7.35) and even the growth-based intrinsic value ($18.88), currently priced at $36.53, driven by high forward earnings expectations. While profitability metrics and dividend yield are attractive, elevated valuation multiples, inconsistent earnings surprises, and a dangerously high payout ratio of 315% raise sustainability concerns. Analysts recommend a 'buy' with a target of $38.73, supported by strong insider sentiment, though no insider transactions have occurred recently.
Ecopetrol (EC) exhibits severe fundamental deterioration, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a technical trend score of 10/100. While the Graham Number suggests a theoretical defensive value, it is an outlier contradicted by an intrinsic value of $8.47 and a current price of $13.80. The company is facing a crisis of growth with earnings plummeting 60.8% YoY and a dividend payout ratio of 95.59% that is unsustainable given the current earnings trajectory. With zero earnings beats in the last four quarters and a target price ($11.69) below the current market price, the outlook is negative.
Compare Another Pair
BP vs EC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares BP p.l.c. (BP) and Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.