No connection

Search Results

BTU vs CRGY

BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$37.96
Market Cap
$4.62B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
78%
CRGY
Crescent Energy Company
NEUTRAL
Price
$12.73
Market Cap
$4.17B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BTU
--
CRGY
23.57
Forward P/E
BTU
10.81
CRGY
5.85
P/B Ratio
BTU
1.3
CRGY
0.81
P/S Ratio
BTU
1.16
CRGY
1.17
EV/EBITDA
BTU
10.48
CRGY
5.09

Profitability

Gross Margin
BTU
13.85%
CRGY
55.65%
Operating Margin
BTU
-1.84%
CRGY
5.46%
Profit Margin
BTU
-0.83%
CRGY
3.71%
ROE
BTU
-0.43%
CRGY
3.51%
ROA
BTU
0.52%
CRGY
2.93%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BTU
-7.0%
CRGY
-1.2%
Earnings Growth
BTU
--
CRGY
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BTU
0.11
CRGY
1.07
Current Ratio
BTU
1.99
CRGY
1.48
Quick Ratio
BTU
1.14
CRGY
0.6

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BTU
0.78%
CRGY
3.77%
Payout Ratio
BTU
27.52%
CRGY
88.89%

AI Verdict

BTU BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals severe financial health concerns with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating weak operational and balance sheet performance. Despite a low forward P/E of 10.81 and a strong analyst recommendation of 'strong_buy', the company is unprofitable (negative net and operating margins), has deteriorating earnings (YoY EPS growth of -95.9%), and lacks key valuation benchmarks like a Graham Number or Altman Z-Score due to financial instability. While the balance sheet shows a healthy current ratio and low debt/equity, persistent losses, poor earnings predictability, and negative insider activity undermine any bullish case. The stock's recent price surge (+99.3% in 1Y) appears disconnected from fundamentals, increasing vulnerability to correction.

Strengths
Low forward P/E ratio of 10.81 suggests potential undervaluation relative to earnings capacity
Strong liquidity position with current ratio of 1.99 and quick ratio of 1.14
Minimal leverage with debt/equity ratio of 0.11, reducing solvency risk
Risks
Critically low Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals severe financial distress and weak operating performance
Negative profitability across all metrics: net margin (-0.83%), operating margin (-1.84%), and ROE (-0.43%)
Earnings are highly volatile and trending down, with YoY EPS growth of -95.9% and erratic estimate beats
CRGY NEUTRAL

CRGY presents a conflicted profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but mediocre financial health. While the stock trades below its Graham Number ($13.82), suggesting defensive value, it trades at a significant premium to its growth-based intrinsic value ($3.78). Severe year-over-year EPS contraction (-103.8%) and a dangerously high dividend payout ratio (88.89%) offset the bullish analyst consensus and low forward P/E. The technical trend is currently bearish (10/100), suggesting a loss of momentum despite strong 1-year gains.

Strengths
Trading below Graham Number ($13.82), indicating defensive undervaluation
Price-to-Book ratio of 0.81 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to assets
Strong 1-year price performance (+57.3%)
Risks
Severe earnings collapse with YoY EPS growth of -103.8%
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 88.89%
Negative revenue growth (-1.20% YoY) indicating stagnation

Compare Another Pair

BTU vs CRGY: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile