BUR vs MA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The deterministic health scores paint a concerning picture, with a Piotroski F-Score of just 3/9 indicating weak financial health, and the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. Despite strong profitability margins and a low Price/Book ratio, the company faces severe revenue contraction (YoY growth of -73.60%) and deeply negative earnings surprises, with 11 of the last 12 quarters missing or drastically underperforming estimates. While the stock trades below the Graham Number of $10.01, suggesting slight undervaluation, the weak fundamentals, deteriorating growth, and lack of insider support undermine this. The strong_buy analyst consensus appears overly optimistic given the deteriorating operational performance and bearish technical trend.
MA shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is strong (F-Score 6/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BUR vs MA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Burford Capital Limited (BUR) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.