DAN vs MAT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Dana Incorporated exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health. Despite a massive 1-year price surge, the company suffers from a negative ROE (-4.27%), an alarmingly high Debt/Equity ratio of 3.94, and a dividend payout ratio of 90.91% that is likely unsustainable. The disconnect between the current price ($38.93) and the earnings track record—where the company has missed estimates in 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average surprise of -41.45%—suggests a momentum-driven bubble rather than value creation.
Mattel exhibits a strong deterministic health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and financial stability. However, this fundamental strength is offset by a severe bearish technical trend (0/100) and concerning earnings decay, with YoY earnings growth at -18.50%. While the stock is priced near its Graham Number ($14.38), suggesting fair value from a defensive standpoint, the divergence between revenue growth (+7.30%) and earnings contraction suggests significant margin pressure. The outlook remains neutral as the low valuation provides a floor, but the lack of earnings momentum prevents a bullish rating.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
DAN vs MAT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Dana Incorporated (DAN) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.