EL vs PG
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Estée Lauder Companies (EL) exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating deteriorating financial health. While the company maintains strong gross margins (74.32%) and has a history of beating earnings estimates, these are overshadowed by an unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 471.43% and a high Debt/Equity ratio of 2.33. Massive insider selling exceeding $1 billion and a catastrophic 5-year price decline of 73.5% suggest a lack of confidence from internal stakeholders and long-term investors. Despite analyst 'buy' recommendations, the combination of negative ROE and weak deterministic scores points to significant structural risk.
PG exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, but it is severely overvalued relative to its deterministic baselines. The current price of $145.71 represents a massive premium over the Graham Number ($58.45) and Intrinsic Value ($47.25), while a PEG ratio of 3.92 indicates the valuation is disconnected from its stagnant growth. Negative earnings growth (-5.40% YoY) combined with bearish insider activity and a 0/100 technical trend suggests significant downside risk despite the company's operational efficiency.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
EL vs PG: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.