ELF vs KO
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ELF presents a stark contrast between explosive growth and deteriorating financial health, evidenced by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. While the company maintains impressive revenue growth (37.8%) and a consistent track record of earnings beats, the valuation remains stretched relative to the Graham Number ($13.32) and Intrinsic Value ($52.22). The stock is currently in a severe technical downtrend, losing 46% of its value in the last six months, compounded by bearish insider selling from the CEO. The discrepancy between a strong operating margin (13.8%) and a negative profit margin (-0.23%) suggests significant non-operating pressures that warrant caution.
KO exhibits a significant disconnect between its current market price ($75.44) and its deterministic value markers, with a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicating weak financial health trends. The stock trades at a massive premium to both its Graham Number ($22.43) and Intrinsic Value ($37.08), while a PEG ratio of 3.95 suggests severe overvaluation relative to its stagnant growth. Despite strong historical earnings beats and high ROE, the combination of bearish insider selling and a 0/100 technical trend signals a lack of immediate catalyst for upside.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ELF vs KO: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.